Like WinDirStat and HWMonitor, Advanced SystemCare features a simple and clean interface.
The program comes with a wide range of features and tools to boost the PC’s performance without requiring technical skills or knowledge.
With Advanced SystemCare, you can easily identify and remove temporary or junk files, unwanted software, corrupt registry entries, and other issues. As such, in the long run, this can affect the system’s performance, and lead to various issues, including crashes, lags, slow speed, etc. While using a computer, you often ignore the importance of proper maintenance and optimization. Here are the screenshots for the conflicting settings.In the last few years, technology has advanced, and you can use software for all kinds of purposes. If someone can test this go post your result in the comments or in the poll, it would be highly appreciated and would help the community and possibly the developers will notice it. If yes then i'm not sure why do they have different configurations. I don't know if these two companies are still related to each other particularly in this, but I know that the old Razer Game booster before it was integrated into Razer cortex which is now System Booster was or based from IObit's own game booster. So that's why i am posting here If someone has the same result as me or is it just me that encounters this kind of problem. Surprisingly IObit Advanced SystemCare made my system more responsive and boot up faster as opposed to Razer which does the opposite.
I tried to apply both optimizations to my system to see the results. They point out exact same settings which in my case were 3 (see screenshots for the setting names). (Applying the optimization on Razer will make IObit optimization status as "unoptimized" vice versa) Okay, so I just found that there are conflicting optimizations between these two softwares. DISCLAIMER: I am just conducting an investigation and I have no intention of promoting IObit software here.
0 kommentar(er)
